Some L1 status updates

This is merely a historical archive of years 2008-2021, before the migration to mailman3.

A maintained and still updated list archive can be found at https://lists.osmocom.org/hyperkitty/list/baseband-devel@lists.osmocom.org/.

Harald Welte laforge at gnumonks.org
Thu Jun 24 16:19:24 UTC 2010


Hi again,

On Thu, Jun 24, 2010 at 09:44:25AM +0200, Harald Welte wrote:
 
> On Wed, Jun 23, 2010 at 07:30:31PM +0200, Harald Welte wrote:
> > > Some 'gotchas' you might encounter that are not fixed yet:
> > > 
> > >  - The L1 completion handler crashes.
> > >    In target/firmware/layer1/prim_tx_nb.c ,
> > > l1s.completion[L1_COMPL_TX_NB] is set in l1s_tx_test() but that's
> > > never called. So you need to comment out
> > > l1s_compl_sched(L1_COMPL_TX_NB) in the 'resp' handler temporarly until
> > > a proper fix.
> > 
> > the proper fix is to either move all the l1s.completion[] assignments to
> > l1s_init(), as they only need to be set once - or to have a initialization
> > function for each primitive.  The first option requires making the completion
> > functions non-static, which I would actually try to avoid.  But having an
> > init callback function for each primitive that only assigns one pointer is
> > probably a stupid idea, too.
> 
> I think the cleanest solution is to use __attribute__ ((constructor))
> like this:

I've now finished the neccessary linker script magic and code to actually
call the constructor functions.  It has all been merged to master.

-- 
- Harald Welte <laforge at gnumonks.org>           http://laforge.gnumonks.org/
============================================================================
"Privacy in residential applications is a desirable marketing option."
                                                  (ETSI EN 300 175-7 Ch. A6)




More information about the baseband-devel mailing list