UmTRX Digest, Vol 4, Issue 35

This is merely a historical archive of years 2008-2021, before the migration to mailman3.

A maintained and still updated list archive can be found at https://lists.osmocom.org/hyperkitty/list/UmTRX@lists.osmocom.org/.

Jean-Samuel Najnudel - BJT PARTNERS SARL jsn at bjtpartners.com
Mon Oct 29 09:59:08 UTC 2012


For example, we might provide such a splitter (10/100/1000 25 Watts at
12/24V).
http://www.planet.com.tw/en/product/product_ov.php?id=39714
:-)

On Mon, Oct 29, 2012 at 10:54 AM, Jean-Samuel Najnudel - BJT PARTNERS SARL <
jsn at bjtpartners.com> wrote:

> Hi Alexander, Hi Andrey,
>
> I am not sure we would need a specific design for PoE.
> We could also keep our current design and provide a PoE splitter with a
> plug adaptor.
> This would let us keep our current design and make the UmTRX work with PoE.
>
> Best regards.
>
> Jean-Samuel.
> :-)
>
>
>
> On Mon, Oct 29, 2012 at 10:40 AM, Alexander Chemeris <
> alexander.chemeris at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> On Mon, Oct 29, 2012 at 1:32 PM, Andrey Sviyazov <andreysviyaz at gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>> > 1) POE components still very expensive for 1GBe and -40 deg C.
>>
>> We don't need -40C rating for them. PoE is useful for nano-BTS
>> deployments and those are mostly in-doors, I think.
>>
>> > 2) We'll experiment with POE when 100MB will possible to use.
>> > Anyway, it should be some sppecial design like nanoBTS, for example.
>>
>> Why can't we have it as an option for indoor nano-BTS style installations?
>>
>> > P.S. why issue 35?
>>
>> I'm not sure I understand the question.
>>
>> --
>> Regards,
>> Alexander Chemeris.
>> CEO, Fairwaves LLC / ООО УмРадио
>> http://fairwaves.ru
>>
>>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osmocom.org/pipermail/umtrx/attachments/20121029/65ec23dc/attachment.htm>


More information about the UmTRX mailing list