UmTRX Digest, Vol 4, Issue 35
Jean-Samuel Najnudel - BJT PARTNERS SARL
jsn at bjtpartners.com
Mon Oct 29 09:54:06 UTC 2012
Hi Alexander, Hi Andrey,
I am not sure we would need a specific design for PoE.
We could also keep our current design and provide a PoE splitter with a
This would let us keep our current design and make the UmTRX work with PoE.
On Mon, Oct 29, 2012 at 10:40 AM, Alexander Chemeris <
alexander.chemeris at gmail.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 29, 2012 at 1:32 PM, Andrey Sviyazov <andreysviyaz at gmail.com>
> > 1) POE components still very expensive for 1GBe and -40 deg C.
> We don't need -40C rating for them. PoE is useful for nano-BTS
> deployments and those are mostly in-doors, I think.
> > 2) We'll experiment with POE when 100MB will possible to use.
> > Anyway, it should be some sppecial design like nanoBTS, for example.
> Why can't we have it as an option for indoor nano-BTS style installations?
> > P.S. why issue 35?
> I'm not sure I understand the question.
> Alexander Chemeris.
> CEO, Fairwaves LLC / ООО УмРадио
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the UmTRX