Data Rate of EGPRS is Too Low
matt9j at cs.washington.edu
Thu Jun 28 13:45:36 UTC 2018
I believe I've found the culprit. It took me longer than I thought it
would, but I have a full Litecell 1.5 network up and running now. I
continued to see poor throughput though, even with the Litecell instead of
a B210! Over the last few days I worked through the different components,
and discovered that it seemed like the bottleneck was in the PCU. That lead
me to take a look at the osmo-pcu issue tracker, where I found the
following ticket: https://osmocom.org/issues/1524 . It looks like the PCU
has trouble communicating with the basebands of some phones, particularly
phones with Mediatek chipsets. I was able to get ahold of an iPhone8 for
testing (Qualcomm baseband), and was able to get a more reasonable 400kbps
of throughput (with healthy PCU packet counters, vs my lab test phone that
had large numbers of PCU TBF timeouts). It just so happened that my main
lab test phones were all low end models with Mediatek chipsets, even though
they were in very different form factors and from different manufacturers.
Hopefully this is helpful-- let me know if you've found another possible
explanation for your observed low throughput.
On Thu, Apr 12, 2018 at 3:43 PM XINKE ZHANG <xinke.zhang at hotmail.com> wrote:
> Hi Matthew,
> I'm sorry for late reply.
> I have also tested the latest split components running on a xubuntu
> 14.04 machine, but the throughput is very limited. I buy a test phone, and
> find that the dl bler is so high. In my opinion, the high dl bler causes
> the low throughput. Nowadays, I'm trying to locate issues, but there is no
> Best Regards,
> *From:* Matthew Johnson <matt9j at cs.washington.edu>
> *Sent:* Wednesday, April 4, 2018 16:54
> *To:* Neels Hofmeyr
> *Cc:* XINKE ZHANG; osmocom-net-gprs at lists.osmocom.org
> *Subject:* Re: Data Rate of EGPRS is Too Low
> Hello Xinke,
> I'm a graduate student at the University of Washington, and just brought
> up an EGPRS/GPRS network with an Ettus B210/osmo-trx. My B210 has a GPSDO
> as well. I'm just getting started on this project (so I'm unfortunately not
> the expert you are looking for), but I can corroborate that I am also
> seeing very limited single user throughput in EGRPS and vanilla GRPS
> (6-8kbps maximum measured via iperf). My network is built with the latest
> split components running on a debian9 virtual machine via virtualbox. I'll
> attach my configs here if they're helpful. I also have access to a
> litecell1.5 and will be bringing up the network on it in the next few
> weeks, so I'll be able to report if it behaves any better. The litecell
> setup will also be running on dedicated hardware to rule out any
> strangeness from virtualbox. Sorry I don't have any other clues at this
> time, but I can at least confirm Neels's analysis above and rule out the
> impact of running the old nitb and ggsn.
> -Matt Johnson
> On Mon, Mar 5, 2018 at 2:15 PM, Neels Hofmeyr <nhofmeyr at sysmocom.de>
> On Sat, Mar 03, 2018 at 12:18:52PM +0000, XINKE ZHANG wrote:
> > I'm sure that B210 has a GPSDO. I execute 'uhd_usrp_probe' to prove it.
> I'm not familiar with it, but if you say so.
> > My entire config files are attached here. Pls help check it. Thanks.
> It all looks good to me. Two minor notes:
> - the pcu config once needed 'two-phase-access' to function reliably, but
> is no longer needed.
> - you seem to be running an old version of the ggsn. The new one is called
> osmo-ggsn with a config file style and vty interface like the other osmo
> programs. However, this should not affect your downlink throughput.
> - you also seem to run osmo-nitb, we have moved to separate programs, being
> osmo-hlr, osmo-msc and osmo-bsc. Refer to
> This should, however, not affect your downlink throughput, either.
> So yeah, sorry, but I have nothing of weight to add. Maybe someone else
> has deeper knowledge of EGPRS and SDR based BTS?
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the osmocom-net-gprs