This is merely a historical archive of years 2008-2021, before the migration to mailman3.
A maintained and still updated list archive can be found at https://lists.osmocom.org/hyperkitty/list/osmocom-net-gprs@lists.osmocom.org/.
Minh-Quang Nguyen minh-quang.nguyen at nutaq.comHi, I perform measurements of the latest implementation of EDGE in osmo-pcu and latest osmo-bts from master branch for LC15 platform. In DL, 2 MBytes of data was downloaded from our a server per measurement and repeat 10 times to get the average DL throughput. In UL, 100 KBytes of data was uploaded to a local server per measurement and repeat 10 times to get the average UL throughput. Coding scheme DL (kbps) UL (kbps) MCS9 184 30 MCS8 144 35.5 MCS7 110 21.5 The throughput is not similar to your measurement and I observed that the PCU prints a bunch messages about 'Scheduling Ack/Nack, because MS is stalled' Do you observe this issue during performance test? What causes the MS stalled? Thanks, Minh-Quang Nguyen Concepteur logiciel | Software designer GSM/Network T. 418 914-7484 x2296 | 1 855 914-7484 | F. 418 914-9477 2150, Cyrille-Duquet, Québec (Québec) G1N 2G3 CANADA minh-quang.nguyen at nutaq.com www.nutaq.com QUEBEC MONTREAL NEW YORK Facebook Twitter LinkedIn YouTube -----Original Message----- From: osmocom-net-gprs [mailto:osmocom-net-gprs-bounces at lists.osmocom.org] On Behalf Of Saurabh Sharan Sent: Friday, July 22, 2016 8:30 AM To: osmocom-net-gprs at lists.osmocom.org Subject: Re: [EGPRS] Performance results for EGPRS test in Radisys lab Hello Max, > What about MCS UL? Do you have some statistics which one has been used The uplink tests have been completed for all EGPRS coding scheme (MCS1 - 9) using the ping or TCP download. We have not conducted specific test for throughput estimation in uplink direction till now. Regards Saurabh