Question regarding TS allocation algorithm(s)

This is merely a historical archive of years 2008-2021, before the migration to mailman3.

A maintained and still updated list archive can be found at https://lists.osmocom.org/hyperkitty/list/osmocom-net-gprs@lists.osmocom.org/.

Holger Hans Peter Freyther hfreyther at sysmocom.de
Sun Sep 29 07:31:42 UTC 2013


Hi,

after the report about the missing usf assignment I started to
refactor the allocation algorithms (remove code duplication, apply
information hiding, directly access things).

Looking at the code it appears that algorithm A and B will always
select the first (in case of A) or the first and following (in case
of B) enabled PDCH.

I have the suspicion that in case of algorithm A only the first
PDCH will be used to assign to phones? And in case of algorithm B
it is likely that the assignments are not spread equally across the
available timeslots?

can someone confirm/deny?

holger


-- 
- Holger Freyther <hfreyther at sysmocom.de>       http://www.sysmocom.de/
=======================================================================
* sysmocom - systems for mobile communications GmbH
* Schivelbeiner Str. 5
* 10439 Berlin, Germany
* Sitz / Registered office: Berlin, HRB 134158 B
* Geschaeftsfuehrer / Managing Directors: Holger Freyther, Harald Welte





More information about the osmocom-net-gprs mailing list