This is merely a historical archive of years 2008-2021, before the migration to mailman3.
A maintained and still updated list archive can be found at https://lists.osmocom.org/hyperkitty/list/OpenBSC@lists.osmocom.org/.
k at rhizomatica.org k at rhizomatica.orgOn 01/04/2017 11:45, Harald Welte wrote: > 80 characters is still > nice here and there, but maybe something like 100, 120 or even 130 might > actually make the code more readable and permit us to use slightly > longer identifiers without having to wrap every second statement in the > code. > > What do people generally think here? Not that I'm coding much on Osmo, well it says RFC.. :-) I have recently been making at attempt to clean up some python coding style using pylint and I have been wincing a little at the "standard" default of a line width of 79, although some arguments in favour do make sense. My terminal is generally 120 -140 characters wide. I also use Sublime Text which usually displays 110 the way I have it. You mentioned something recently about why would anyone read code in a web browser, I find myself browsing code more and more on sites such as github, rather than getting a local copy, via clone or download and extract etc. - I had a conversation recently about how we tend more to lookup quick reminders of things on the web, even though there are local manpages. need to get offline more.. :) Anyway, github site handles 120 chars fine. I guess any issue might be more with gerrit. k/