[PATCH] Add A5/3 and 4 support

Max.Suraev at fairwaves.co
Tue Jun 17 08:43:56 UTC 2014


16.06.2014 23:24, Sylvain Munaut пишет:

> Why the _ prefix ? It's exported and in the header and none of the
> other have it. Unnecessary inconsistency.
> 

Agree but I would rather hide implementation details of all osmo_a5_* from public API
completely into separate non-installable header. Generic osmo_a5 should be fine for
all use cases. Are there any reasons we expose those?


-- 
best regards,
Max, http://fairwaves.co




More information about the baseband-devel mailing list