[PATCH] COMP128v23 improvements

[☎]

All fixed. Let me know if I've overlooked something.

22.11.2013 16:44, Harald Welte пишет:
> Hi Max,
>
> I would like to merge your patch, but:
>
> On Tue, Nov 19, 2013 at 12:25:52PM +0100, ☎ wrote:
>> +int
>> +comp128v2(const uint8_t *ki, const uint8_t *rand, uint8_t *sres, uint8_t *kc)
>> +{
>> +    int r = comp128v3(ki, rand, sres, kc);
>> +    kc[7] = 0; /* 10 last bits of Kc forced to 0 */
>> +    kc[6] &= 0xfc;
>> +    return r;
>> +}
> this is space-indented, not tab-indented.
>
>> +static struct osmo_sub_auth_data test_aux2 = {
>> +	.type = OSMO_AUTH_TYPE_GSM,
>> +	.algo = OSMO_AUTH_ALG_COMP128v2,
>> +	.u.gsm = {
>> +	.ki =   { 0xAA, 0xAA, 0xAA, 0xAA, 0xAA, 0xAA, 0xAA, 0xAA, 0xAA, 0xAA, 0xAA, 0xAA, 0xAA, 0xAA, 0xAA, 0xAA },
> those lienes are too long for 80-character wide terminals
>
>> +    uint8_t buf[12];
>> +    osmo_hexparse(res, buf, 12);
>> +    if (0 != memcmp(buf, vec->sres, 4)) {
>> +	printf("%d FAIL SRES:\n", rc);
> there's again mixed space and tab indentation.
>
>> +void test_comp128v3(char * rand, char * res) {
> we put the curly braces at the beginning of the line, not at the end of
> the line.  And again the functions are space indented.
>
> Furthermore, your patch does not apply on top of master.
>
> It's sad to see that valuable contributions are lost due to basic coding
> style issues not being observed.  We had this back in April with your
> KASUMI related patches, and it was never fixed.   Please take the time
> to fix those issues, thanks.
>
> Regards,
> 	Harald


-- 
best regards,
Max, http://fairwaves.ru