This is merely a historical archive of years 2008-2021, before the migration to mailman3.
A maintained and still updated list archive can be found at https://lists.osmocom.org/hyperkitty/list/baseband-devel@lists.osmocom.org/.
eisencah eisenach wbg_1000 at yahoo.comHi. Is there any reason why in the sim_handler() function, in case SIM_STATE_TX_DATA: if (!txDoneFlag) break; /* wait until data is transmitted */ /* Disable all interrupt driven functions */ writew(0xFF, REG_SIM_MASKIT); /* Ignore waiting char for RUN GSM ALGORITHM */ /* TODO: implement proper handling of the "Procedure Bytes" than this is no longer needed */ if(sim_data[1] == 0x88) sim_ignore_waiting_char = 1; sim_state = SIM_STATE_RX_STATUS; calypso_sim_receive(response + length + 1, 2); break; we do "calypso_sim_receive(response + length + 1, 2);" instead of "calypso_sim_receive(response + 1, 2);". Seems an unnecessary overhead sending back some junk chars there. Or I'm missing something? Cheers, Mihai. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.osmocom.org/pipermail/baseband-devel/attachments/20120613/4b81f875/attachment.htm>