This is merely a historical archive of years 2008-2021, before the migration to mailman3.
A maintained and still updated list archive can be found at https://lists.osmocom.org/hyperkitty/list/baseband-devel@lists.osmocom.org/.
bob avwiseav at gmail.comthe flow is the TCH steal bit in a test network;in the burst_id branch, I do as following: osmo_pbit2ubit_ext(steal_bit, 0 , bi->bits, 114 , 2 , 0); printf("steal_bit %x , %x\n",steal_bit[0],steal_bit[1]); is that right?the result is below,: SACCH fn = 452204 fn_report = 90 steal_bit 1 , 0 steal_bit 0 , 0 steal_bit 1 , 1 steal_bit 0 , 0 steal_bit 0 , 1 steal_bit 1 , 1 steal_bit 1 , 0 steal_bit 1 , 1 steal_bit 0 , 0 steal_bit 0 , 0 steal_bit 0 , 0 steal_bit 0 , 0 steal_bit 1 , 0 steal_bit 0 , 0 steal_bit 1 , 0 steal_bit 0 , 0 steal_bit 1 , 0 steal_bit 1 , 1 steal_bit 0 , 0 steal_bit 1 , 1 steal_bit 1 , 0 steal_bit 0 , 0 steal_bit 1 , 0 steal_bit 0 , 0 SACCH fn = 452230 fn_report = 12 steal_bit 0 , 1 steal_bit 1 , 1 steal_bit 0 , 1 steal_bit 1 , 1 steal_bit 0 , 1 steal_bit 0 , 0 steal_bit 1 , 1 steal_bit 0 , 0 steal_bit 0 , 0 steal_bit 0 , 1 steal_bit 0 , 1 steal_bit 0 , 1 steal_bit 1 , 0 steal_bit 0 , 0 steal_bit 0 , 1 steal_bit 1 , 1 steal_bit 0 , 0 steal_bit 0 , 0 steal_bit 0 , 0 steal_bit 0 , 0 steal_bit 0 , 1 steal_bit 1 , 0 steal_bit 1 , 0 steal_bit 0 , 0 SACCH fn = 452256 fn_report = 38 steal_bit 0 , 0 steal_bit 0 , 0 steal_bit 0 , 1 steal_bit 0 , 0 steal_bit 0 , 0 steal_bit 0 , 0 steal_bit 0 , 0 steal_bit 1 , 0 steal_bit 1 , 1 steal_bit 0 , 0 steal_bit 1 , 1 steal_bit 1 , 0 steal_bit 1 , 0 steal_bit 0 , 1 steal_bit 1 , 0 steal_bit 0 , 1 steal_bit 1 , 1 steal_bit 1 , 0 steal_bit 0 , 0 steal_bit 0 , 0 steal_bit 0 , 1 steal_bit 0 , 0 steal_bit 0 , 1 steal_bit 1 , 0 SACCH fn = 452282 fn_report = 64 steal_bit 0 , 0 steal_bit 0 , 0 steal_bit 0 , 0 steal_bit 0 , 0 steal_bit 1 , 1 steal_bit 1 , 0 steal_bit 0 , 0 steal_bit 1 , 0 steal_bit 0 , 1 steal_bit 0 , 0 steal_bit 0 , 1 steal_bit 1 , 1 steal_bit 0 , 0 steal_bit 1 , 0 steal_bit 0 , 1 steal_bit 0 , 0 steal_bit 1 , 0 steal_bit 0 , 0 steal_bit 0 , 0 steal_bit 0 , 0 steal_bit 0 , 0 steal_bit 0 , 0 steal_bit 1 , 0 steal_bit 0 , 1 SACCH fn = 452308 fn_report = 90 steal_bit 0 , 1 steal_bit 1 , 1 steal_bit 1 , 0 steal_bit 0 , 1 steal_bit 1 , 0 steal_bit 0 , 0 steal_bit 0 , 1 steal_bit 1 , 1 steal_bit 0 , 0 steal_bit 0 , 0 steal_bit 0 , 0 steal_bit 0 , 0 steal_bit 1 , 1 steal_bit 0 , 0 steal_bit 1 , 0 steal_bit 1 , 1 steal_bit 0 , 1 steal_bit 1 , 1 steal_bit 1 , 0 steal_bit 1 , 1 steal_bit 1 , 1 steal_bit 0 , 0 steal_bit 0 , 1 steal_bit 0 , 0 SACCH fn = 452334 fn_report = 12 steal_bit 0 , 0 steal_bit 0 , 0 steal_bit 1 , 1 steal_bit 0 , 0 steal_bit 0 , 0 steal_bit 0 , 1 steal_bit 1 , 0 steal_bit 0 , 1 steal_bit 0 , 1 steal_bit 0 , 1 steal_bit 1 , 1 steal_bit 0 , 1 steal_bit 1 , 0 steal_bit 0 , 0 steal_bit 0 , 0 steal_bit 0 , 1 steal_bit 0 , 0 steal_bit 0 , 0 steal_bit 0 , 0 steal_bit 0 , 0 steal_bit 0 , 0 steal_bit 0 , 1 steal_bit 0 , 0 steal_bit 0 , 0 SACCH fn = 452360 fn_report = 38 steal_bit 0 , 1 steal_bit 1 , 1 steal_bit 1 , 0 steal_bit 0 , 0 steal_bit 1 , 0 steal_bit 0 , 0 steal_bit 0 , 0 steal_bit 0 , 1 steal_bit 1 , 1 steal_bit 1 , 0 steal_bit 0 , 0 steal_bit 0 , 1 steal_bit 1 , 1 steal_bit 1 , 0 steal_bit 0 , 0 steal_bit 1 , 1 steal_bit 0 , 1 steal_bit 0 , 0 steal_bit 0 , 0 steal_bit 1 , 0 steal_bit 0 , 0 steal_bit 1 , 1 steal_bit 0 , 0 steal_bit 1 , 0 SACCH fn = 452386 fn_report = 64 steal_bit 0 , 0 steal_bit 0 , 0 steal_bit 0 , 0 but I think it is not correct,because A FACCH/F frame of 456 coded bits is mapped on 8 consecutive bursts as specified for the TCH/FS, the even numbered bits in the first 4 bursts and the odd numbered bits of the last 4 bursts are stolen. so I think what is right is : steal_bit 1, 0 steal_bit 1 , 0 steal_bit 1 , 0 steal_bit 1 , 0 steal_bit 0 , 1 steal_bit 0 , 1 steal_bit 0 , 1 steal_bit 0 , 1 steal_bit 1 , 0 steal_bit 1 , 0 steal_bit 1 , 0 steal_bit 1 , 0 I am puzzled, what is the right answer? -- View this message in context: http://baseband-devel.722152.n3.nabble.com/the-layer1-FN-count-tp4025120p4025121.html Sent from the baseband-devel mailing list archive at Nabble.com.