should we continue to focus on nuttx?

Alan Carvalho de Assis acassis at
Mon Apr 30 17:30:47 UTC 2012

Hi Harald,

First all sorry top-posting...

NuttX also have support to dot-matrix displays, see this "mp3 player"
running NuttX:

Best Regards,


On 4/30/12, Harald Welte <laforge at> wrote:
> Hi Denis,
> there was no decision on OsmoDevCon, apart from some opinions.
> I'm not aware of anyone actually having reviewed/evaluated rockbox at
> this point.
> The general point was that we apparently don't really _need_ a "full OS"
> like NuttX, but there are other solutions like rockbox that may bring in
> other useful parts like a UI for low-resolution dot-matrix displays.
> I guess until somebody actually tries and experiments with an early port
> of rockbox to the calypso, we won't know what is the best way to move
> forward :/
> And in general, everybody seems to be busy with lots of other things, so
> I'm not sure if (and when) that might happen.
> Regards,
> 	Harald
> --
> - Harald Welte <laforge at>
> ============================================================================
> "Privacy in residential applications is a desirable marketing option."
>                                                   (ETSI EN 300 175-7 Ch.
> A6)

More information about the baseband-devel mailing list