should we continue to focus on nuttx?

This is merely a historical archive of years 2008-2021, before the migration to mailman3.

A maintained and still updated list archive can be found at https://lists.osmocom.org/hyperkitty/list/baseband-devel@lists.osmocom.org/.

Alan Carvalho de Assis acassis at gmail.com
Mon Apr 30 17:30:47 UTC 2012


Hi Harald,

First all sorry top-posting...

NuttX also have support to dot-matrix displays, see this "mp3 player"
running NuttX:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A39rsIf07AA

Best Regards,

Alan

On 4/30/12, Harald Welte <laforge at gnumonks.org> wrote:
> Hi Denis,
>
> there was no decision on OsmoDevCon, apart from some opinions.
>
> I'm not aware of anyone actually having reviewed/evaluated rockbox at
> this point.
>
> The general point was that we apparently don't really _need_ a "full OS"
> like NuttX, but there are other solutions like rockbox that may bring in
> other useful parts like a UI for low-resolution dot-matrix displays.
>
> I guess until somebody actually tries and experiments with an early port
> of rockbox to the calypso, we won't know what is the best way to move
> forward :/
>
> And in general, everybody seems to be busy with lots of other things, so
> I'm not sure if (and when) that might happen.
>
> Regards,
> 	Harald
>
> --
> - Harald Welte <laforge at gnumonks.org>
> http://laforge.gnumonks.org/
> ============================================================================
> "Privacy in residential applications is a desirable marketing option."
>                                                   (ETSI EN 300 175-7 Ch.
> A6)
>




More information about the baseband-devel mailing list