should we continue to focus on nuttx?
laforge at gnumonks.org
Mon Apr 30 16:02:16 UTC 2012
there was no decision on OsmoDevCon, apart from some opinions.
I'm not aware of anyone actually having reviewed/evaluated rockbox at
The general point was that we apparently don't really _need_ a "full OS"
like NuttX, but there are other solutions like rockbox that may bring in
other useful parts like a UI for low-resolution dot-matrix displays.
I guess until somebody actually tries and experiments with an early port
of rockbox to the calypso, we won't know what is the best way to move
And in general, everybody seems to be busy with lots of other things, so
I'm not sure if (and when) that might happen.
- Harald Welte <laforge at gnumonks.org> http://laforge.gnumonks.org/
"Privacy in residential applications is a desirable marketing option."
(ETSI EN 300 175-7 Ch. A6)
More information about the baseband-devel