This is merely a historical archive of years 2008-2021, before the migration to mailman3.
A maintained and still updated list archive can be found at https://lists.osmocom.org/hyperkitty/list/baseband-devel@lists.osmocom.org/.
Aaron Zauner azet at azet.orgWhat poor students are you talking of? azet On 1/23/11, Peter Stuge <peter at stuge.se> wrote: > Marten Christophe wrote: >> Kindly give me code or even binary file for sniff code which >> Sylvain demonstrated in chao meeting, > > Kindly read > http://lists.osmocom.org/pipermail/baseband-devel/2010-December/000912.html > > >> Pls reply >> pls help >> or pls advise >> Kindly reply >> pls provide > > I'm sure you realize that this sounds like a nagging child. > > I think one can always beenfit from considering the group that one is > communicating in. Many quite skilled developers work together in this > and most other open source projects, and the way to get things that > one wants is never to nag. > > At best one will be silently ignored, at worst one will get banned. > In any case, the impression people will be left with suffers > dramatically from any behavior not clearly trying to further the > project. I have seen this happen in many projects, and many times I > am sure that it is caused mainly by problems in communication, such > as language barriers, rhetoric skill, and so on. Other times it is > simply because someone is stupid. (I don't know you at all well > enough to say if that holds for you, probably not, but your emails > may cause people to think so.) > > >> advise me how i can modify existing code up to that level. > .. >> it will help me allot, my NGO can deploy a pilot project at least > > I guess you are still working on the idea that developers here fairly > clearly judged as not being really worthwhile. And now you plea for > people to go out of their way to support it. That demonstrates a lack > of understanding for open source projects, where *you* are always > responsible for fulfilling *your* needs. Of course you can ask others > to do stuff, by politely making suggestions, but you must respect if > they have no interest in your ideas. > > But nothing stops you from moving ahead on your own and proving > everyone wrong! In fact that is one great thing about open source. > When going against the flow of course you must be prepared to not > get much, if any, help. > > Maybe Sylvain will be interested in licensing some work to your NGO > for a pilot project - if so I guess he will get in touch with you - > but honestly I doubt that, based on nothing but how you behave on > this mailing list. :\ > > Besides the tone in your email you have hijacked the thread about the > Osmocom logo request. This suggests unfamiliarity with mailing list > etiquette, which also hurts your standing in the project rather > severely. One could think this should not be so important, because it > is a technicality, but on the other hand we are all technicians, and > the technicalities are there for a reason; they allow the most > efficient communication. So by not knowing the etiquette you are > creating inefficiencies for every mailing list subscriber and for the > afterworld (in the archives) which as I am sure you understand is > very strongly frowned upon. > > > Perhaps you could benefit from the recently announced TETRA code.. > > http://tetra.osmocom.org/trac/ > > Maybe it fits your application better than plain GSM, as you seem to > be on good terms with the regulatory body in your deployment area. > > > Kind regards > > //Peter > >