This is merely a historical archive of years 2008-2021, before the migration to mailman3.
A maintained and still updated list archive can be found at https://lists.osmocom.org/hyperkitty/list/baseband-devel@lists.osmocom.org/.
Harald Welte laforge at gnumonks.orgHi Andreas, soryr for the delayed response, I am on holidays after all ;) On Wed, Mar 10, 2010 at 07:35:06PM +0100, Andreas.Eversberg wrote: > sometimes l3 message headers includes protocol header: see struct > gsm48_imm_ass > and sometimes it is just the information element part: see struct > gsm48_loc_upd_req yes, this is inconsistent and it should be avoided. > since i work with layer 3 messages, i need a uniform way to define these > headers. i will add new headers for messages i implement to gsm_04_08.h. > > therefore i need a decision. i prefer that the headers (like > gsm48_imm_ass or gsm48_loc_upd_req) consists of the information elements > parts only. I agree. Are you willing to create/test/submit patches for libosmocore and openbsc? I'm happy to merge them. Thanks! -- - Harald Welte <laforge at gnumonks.org> http://laforge.gnumonks.org/ ============================================================================ "Privacy in residential applications is a desirable marketing option." (ETSI EN 300 175-7 Ch. A6)