laforge at gnumonks.org
Sun Mar 14 16:18:01 UTC 2010
soryr for the delayed response, I am on holidays after all ;)
On Wed, Mar 10, 2010 at 07:35:06PM +0100, Andreas.Eversberg wrote:
> sometimes l3 message headers includes protocol header: see struct
> and sometimes it is just the information element part: see struct
yes, this is inconsistent and it should be avoided.
> since i work with layer 3 messages, i need a uniform way to define these
> headers. i will add new headers for messages i implement to gsm_04_08.h.
> therefore i need a decision. i prefer that the headers (like
> gsm48_imm_ass or gsm48_loc_upd_req) consists of the information elements
> parts only.
I agree. Are you willing to create/test/submit patches for libosmocore
and openbsc? I'm happy to merge them.
- Harald Welte <laforge at gnumonks.org> http://laforge.gnumonks.org/
"Privacy in residential applications is a desirable marketing option."
(ETSI EN 300 175-7 Ch. A6)
More information about the baseband-devel