status layer 3
laforge at gnumonks.org
Tue Mar 9 08:48:34 UTC 2010
On Mon, Mar 08, 2010 at 07:26:01PM +0100, Andreas.Eversberg wrote:
> just to see if i understand it right, here is my view of how it should
yes, I completely agree with your example scenario. This is how I
imagined the complete stack traversal.
Of course, at this point everything is still subject to discussion, so
if you prefer a different approach, feel free to propose it. I've
stated my reasons for using a [modified where neccessary] RSL in the
last mail and found them quite convincing ;)
> while the message is walking from radio ressource layer down to layer 1,
> the primitives for inter-layer communication are added by the sending
> layer and removed by the receiving layer.
- Harald Welte <laforge at gnumonks.org> http://laforge.gnumonks.org/
"Privacy in residential applications is a desirable marketing option."
(ETSI EN 300 175-7 Ch. A6)
More information about the baseband-devel