Some L1 status updates
laforge at gnumonks.org
Thu Jun 24 07:45:02 UTC 2010
On Wed, Jun 23, 2010 at 01:39:09PM +0200, Sylvain Munaut wrote:
> For the RACH_CONF, from the code, I see that it already contains the
> frame number at which the RACH was sent.
> (in the l1ctl_info_dl header of the CONF message, the frame_nr field is set)
yes, this is how I intended it to be used.
- Harald Welte <laforge at gnumonks.org> http://laforge.gnumonks.org/
"Privacy in residential applications is a desirable marketing option."
(ETSI EN 300 175-7 Ch. A6)
More information about the baseband-devel