squalyl at gmail.com
Thu Aug 19 11:49:56 UTC 2010
Well the reply from Harald tells me I didn't get Andreas' response in full,
and it seems some replies have to be made.
Can someone forward it to the list?
On Thu, Aug 19, 2010 at 1:40 PM, Harald Welte <laforge at gnumonks.org> wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 19, 2010 at 11:42:44AM +0200, Andreas.Eversberg wrote:
> > hi sebastien,
> > thanx for you advice. i will have job names like SIM_JOB_READ,
> > SIM_JOB_UPDATE, SIM_JOB_GSMALGO,... i am a bit unsure about the path
> array. i
> > always thought that each EF has a unique ID. the DF where it is located,
> > be determined by the first byte of the EF ID. but if it is possible to
> have a
> > sim with multiple DFgsm, then a path is required of course.
> I think it isn't good to just think of a normal SIM, but keep it as
> with regard to smartcards compliant to 7816-4. Adding a path will not
> make things terribly more complex, so I'd also agree with Sebastien to
> tha path and be more flexible as a result.
> - Harald Welte <laforge at gnumonks.org>
> "Privacy in residential applications is a desirable marketing option."
> (ETSI EN 300 175-7 Ch. A6)
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the baseband-devel