This is merely a historical archive of years 2008-2021, before the migration to mailman3.
A maintained and still updated list archive can be found at https://lists.osmocom.org/hyperkitty/list/UmTRX@lists.osmocom.org/.
Alexander Chemeris alexander.chemeris at gmail.comHi Jean-Samuel, On Mon, Oct 29, 2012 at 1:54 PM, Jean-Samuel Najnudel - BJT PARTNERS SARL <jsn at bjtpartners.com> wrote: > I am not sure we would need a specific design for PoE. > We could also keep our current design and provide a PoE splitter with a plug > adaptor. > This would let us keep our current design and make the UmTRX work with PoE. Yes, that's what we could do initially, it's not something we need urgently. The discussion is whether we should consider this for some later revision of UmTRX. The concern about a separate PoE splitter is that it might reduce overall system reliability. OTOH, it's easier to replace a broken separate PoE splitter then replace the whole UmTRX if built-in PoE is broken. AT the same time, separate PoE is more expensive and require more space. Thus it's not clear to me whether a built-in PoE would be a benefit or not. -- Regards, Alexander Chemeris. CEO, Fairwaves LLC / ООО УмРадио http://fairwaves.ru