This is merely a historical archive of years 2008-2021, before the migration to mailman3.
A maintained and still updated list archive can be found at https://lists.osmocom.org/hyperkitty/list/UmTRX@lists.osmocom.org/.
Jean-Samuel Najnudel - BJT PARTNERS SARL jsn at bjtpartners.comHi Alexander, Hi Andrey, I am not sure we would need a specific design for PoE. We could also keep our current design and provide a PoE splitter with a plug adaptor. This would let us keep our current design and make the UmTRX work with PoE. Best regards. Jean-Samuel. :-) On Mon, Oct 29, 2012 at 10:40 AM, Alexander Chemeris < alexander.chemeris at gmail.com> wrote: > On Mon, Oct 29, 2012 at 1:32 PM, Andrey Sviyazov <andreysviyaz at gmail.com> > wrote: > > 1) POE components still very expensive for 1GBe and -40 deg C. > > We don't need -40C rating for them. PoE is useful for nano-BTS > deployments and those are mostly in-doors, I think. > > > 2) We'll experiment with POE when 100MB will possible to use. > > Anyway, it should be some sppecial design like nanoBTS, for example. > > Why can't we have it as an option for indoor nano-BTS style installations? > > > P.S. why issue 35? > > I'm not sure I understand the question. > > -- > Regards, > Alexander Chemeris. > CEO, Fairwaves LLC / ООО УмРадио > http://fairwaves.ru > > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.osmocom.org/pipermail/umtrx/attachments/20121029/b3fa99f6/attachment.htm>