UAT

Pete Zaitcev zaitcev at kotori.zaitcev.us
Fri Dec 6 20:37:01 UTC 2013


I can't really tell, sorry. The waterfall looks like the attached.
The frequency offset is 312.5 kHz for the FSK. I think I see some
dots, but cannot be sure if they are good or not. Hardware receivers
in the area are said to work, but I don't see anything.

-- Pete

On Fri, 6 Dec 2013 10:54:04 -0800
Nick Foster <bistromath at gmail.com> wrote:

> You have sample data with good signal?
> 
> 
> On Fri, Dec 6, 2013 at 10:48 AM, Pete Zaitcev <zaitcev at kotori.zaitcev.us>wrote:
> 
> > Hi, All:
> >
> > Recent postings by Fritz and Nick reminded me about my ignomous failure
> > to decode UAT. In theory, 2.8 s/s ought to be suffice for a 1 mbit/s
> > signal of UAT, barely, but in practice I wasn't successful. Has anyone
> > heard about any successes on that front (aside from old postings by
> > Eric Cottrell)? Is it even realistic?
> >
> > Cheers,
> > -- Pete
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: waterfall_r820t_1.png
Type: image/x-apple-ios-png
Size: 218196 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.osmocom.org/pipermail/osmocom-sdr/attachments/20131206/a5b15845/attachment.bin>


More information about the osmocom-sdr mailing list