This is merely a historical archive of years 2008-2021, before the migration to mailman3.
A maintained and still updated list archive can be found at https://lists.osmocom.org/hyperkitty/list/osmocom-sdr@lists.osmocom.org/.
Leif Asbrink leif at sm5bsz.comOn Sun, 8 Jul 2012 12:30:05 -0500 "Jay Salsburg" <jsalsburg at bellsouth.net> wrote: > The E4000 Tuner offers a stepping stone into the world of SDRs. > It does the heavy lifting, significantly reducing the size, > cost, and complexity of a SDR. It does not do any programmable > signal processing, which is where SDRs are strongest. > Quantization has been left out of the discussion because the > RTL2832 is so bad at it (to conserve size and cost). The RTL2832 > hamstrings the usefulness of the E4000 significantly narrowing > the application of DSP. If you want high fidelity reception, > you must apply a high fidelity ADC. I do not understand how you think to arrive at this conclusion. The RTL2832/E4000 dongels allow superior quality demodulation of FM signals. The suppression of neighbouring channels is limited due to aliasing, but it is not bad and interference can be avoided by changing the LO frequency. There is also a mirror image but if you use Linrad you can apply the calibration procedure that eliminates image spurs. Now that AGC is eliminated these dongles allow a pretty good general purpose SDR at small cost. http://www.sm5bsz.com/linuxdsp/hware/rtlsdr/rtlsdr.htm The high fidelity reception is in no way limited by the ADC in these dongles as long as the desired signal is not much weaker than surrounding signals. (Much means 50 dB or so.) Regards Leif / SM5BSZ