This is merely a historical archive of years 2008-2021, before the migration to mailman3.
A maintained and still updated list archive can be found at https://lists.osmocom.org/hyperkitty/list/osmocom-event-orga@lists.osmocom.org/.
Harald Welte laforge at osmocom.orgOn Tue, Dec 10, 2019 at 08:51:53PM +0100, Alexander 'lynxis' Couzens wrote:
> BNetzA will license us 850 band (5mhz).
> Telefonica will license use 2600 band (10 mhz, 100mw).
Sad (no 1800). I guess that's final? Or are you pursuing alternatives with other operators?
> I would like to have a LTE setup.
The eNB from camp can be used again. At least all but one which seemed
broken, but meanwhile I think I obtained 1-2 more. So I guess you could
operate 6-7 of them. It will by far be insufficient to cover the fair grounds.
Make sure you place them physically at very elevated locations to have line-of-sight
to most subscribers. I think one of the problems at the camp was that they were at
less than 2m height, which means every human being in between the user and the eNB
is a large attenuator.
> How should we use the 850 band?
> Should we use it for GSM? UMTS? Or both? Like GSM in the edges, UMTS in
> the middle?
I think due to the very different spectrum usage of narrow-band TDMA GSM
and wideband CDMA in UMTS you will very likely get significant interference
in the GSM -> UMTS direction. Particularly on uplink, where it's actually
more difficult to manage as the phone might just be ad the edge of a GSM cell
(downlink very weak, no interference) but then the phone sends at maximum power
- in all directions, not just in the direction of your GSM BTS.
So from a RF / physical point of view, I would argue against operating two
technologies on the very same channel, unless you can more or less prove that
due to physical distance/isolation there won't be any interference.
--
- Harald Welte <laforge at osmocom.org> http://laforge.gnumonks.org/
============================================================================
"Privacy in residential applications is a desirable marketing option."
(ETSI EN 300 175-7 Ch. A6)