This is merely a historical archive of years 2008-2021, before the migration to mailman3.
A maintained and still updated list archive can be found at https://lists.osmocom.org/hyperkitty/list/osmocom-event-orga@lists.osmocom.org/.
Harald Welte laforge at osmocom.orgOn Tue, Dec 10, 2019 at 08:51:53PM +0100, Alexander 'lynxis' Couzens wrote: > BNetzA will license us 850 band (5mhz). > Telefonica will license use 2600 band (10 mhz, 100mw). Sad (no 1800). I guess that's final? Or are you pursuing alternatives with other operators? > I would like to have a LTE setup. The eNB from camp can be used again. At least all but one which seemed broken, but meanwhile I think I obtained 1-2 more. So I guess you could operate 6-7 of them. It will by far be insufficient to cover the fair grounds. Make sure you place them physically at very elevated locations to have line-of-sight to most subscribers. I think one of the problems at the camp was that they were at less than 2m height, which means every human being in between the user and the eNB is a large attenuator. > How should we use the 850 band? > Should we use it for GSM? UMTS? Or both? Like GSM in the edges, UMTS in > the middle? I think due to the very different spectrum usage of narrow-band TDMA GSM and wideband CDMA in UMTS you will very likely get significant interference in the GSM -> UMTS direction. Particularly on uplink, where it's actually more difficult to manage as the phone might just be ad the edge of a GSM cell (downlink very weak, no interference) but then the phone sends at maximum power - in all directions, not just in the direction of your GSM BTS. So from a RF / physical point of view, I would argue against operating two technologies on the very same channel, unless you can more or less prove that due to physical distance/isolation there won't be any interference. -- - Harald Welte <laforge at osmocom.org> http://laforge.gnumonks.org/ ============================================================================ "Privacy in residential applications is a desirable marketing option." (ETSI EN 300 175-7 Ch. A6)