OsmoDevCon important information

historical

On Mar 31, 2013 8:12 PM, "Alexander Chemeris" <alexander.chemeris at gmail.com>
wrote:
>
> On Sun, Mar 31, 2013 at 6:29 PM, Harald Welte <laforge at gnumonks.org>
wrote:
> > On Sun, Mar 31, 2013 at 10:29:28AM +0400, Alexander Chemeris wrote:
> >> * It would be great to have an intro to the L2 layer. At least for
> >> Ivan and me a kickstart in this would be of great value.
> >
> > You're talking about LAPDm?  A general talk aobut LAPDm or specifically
> > the libosmocore implementation?  And if so, why?  Do you plan to do any
> > modifications in that area?  I thin L2 is quite boring once it has been
> > implemented and no bugs are visible...
>
> Yes, LAPDm. It's boring, but it's kind of a good thing to understand
> even if you don't need to implement it. Even if you consider it as a
> black box, you should know the properties of this black box.
>
> In OpenBTS LAPDm implementation is kind of buggy, so we'd like to know
> more about the way it's implemented in Osmocom and may be borrow some
> ideas.
>
> So, the ideal way I see it would be to have an overview of the way it
> operates with picks into the Osmocom code.
>

Also an interface between L2 and L3 in Osmocom is interesting topic for us
to see whether we could replace all lower levels of OpenBTS with Osmocom
implementation. Holger's aim at testing and general Osmocom community
openness appeals to me a lot. I'd love to see more Osmocom components to be
used in our version of OpenBTS.

Please excuse typos. Written with a touchscreen keyboard.

--
Regards,
Alexander Chemeris
CEO/Founder Fairwaves LLC
http://fairwaves.ru
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.osmocom.org/mailman/private/osmocom-event-orga/attachments/20130401/1e614b6d/attachment.htm>