This is merely a historical archive of years 2008-2021, before the migration to mailman3.
A maintained and still updated list archive can be found at https://lists.osmocom.org/hyperkitty/list/OpenBSC@lists.osmocom.org/.
Harald Welte laforge at gnumonks.orgHi Gullik,
On Sat, Jan 12, 2019 at 08:22:05PM +0100, Gullik Webjorn wrote:
> Below is a measurement on my "most distant" BTS, BTS 1. From what I see,
> downlink is 35 dB
What do you mean by "downlink is 35dB"?
> below uplink, which of course is natural when the MS can produce 30 dBm, and
> the BTS which
>
> in this case uses a bareback Limesdr min, can only produce 10 dBm.
If you are using a general-purpose SDR hardware you cannot expect that
any of the signal levels written anywhere actually meany anything at
all. There is no absolute levels reported by SDR hardware anywhere, and
there is no calibration of either transmit nor receiver. This means:
* there's no general calibration curve for the chip/board
* there's no per-unit individual calibration curve for the unit you have
This is *very* different from a real GSM base station. Without
designing a calibration procedure for the above, as well as some
mechanism to apply it in production, I don't think one can expect any of
the readings to state anything realistic, nor expect any power control loops
to operate.
Please don't get me wrong, general-purpose SDRs such as USRPs or LimeSDR
are great tools for experiments in the lab. But that's what they are -
at least for the time being. There is a *big* difference between a
real-world base station and a GP-SDR board.
> the bsc parameter ms max power is set to 15 for both bts 0 and bts 1.
> However, it seems MS output power is *much* stronger.
The 16dBm is probably the closest one can get to the 15 dBm you
requested:
> L1 MS Power: 16 dBm, Timing Advance: 0
How do you establish this fact? Did you attach a RF power meter to the
MS output and masure the output power?
--
- Harald Welte <laforge at gnumonks.org> http://laforge.gnumonks.org/
============================================================================
"Privacy in residential applications is a desirable marketing option."
(ETSI EN 300 175-7 Ch. A6)