This is merely a historical archive of years 2008-2021, before the migration to mailman3.
A maintained and still updated list archive can be found at https://lists.osmocom.org/hyperkitty/list/OpenBSC@lists.osmocom.org/.
Harald Welte laforge at osmocom.orgHi Keith, On Wed, Dec 04, 2019 at 02:36:43PM +0100, Keith wrote: > > == DNS zone / .msisdn suffix === > > > > One question I had was regarding the use of the .{msisdn,imsi} TLD. I would argue > > it is probably besser to use something that fits within the existing DNS hierarchy > > without contesting IANA's authority on gTLDs. > > I'd vote for, if at all possible, not making any link to/dependency on > DNS hierarchy. I'm not suggesting a dependency. You can always operate whatever DNS or mDNS on whatever domain names in a network under your control. I just think it might be smart to try to avoid using a global namespace that more "authoritive" users might use for something else in the future, who knows. The D-GSM mDNS will work irrespective of the public DNS system as we know it. > > == GSUP keepalives / connection loss detection == > > > > In the presence of unreliable back-haul mesh between villages, the GSUP > > connection can also not be seen as reliable. We would expect to see TCP > > stalls due to packet loss, etc. > > We don't envisage a separation between MSC and HLR over unreliable > back-haul, but I think I'm missing something here. (I still need to > actually implement a local setup and observe) In an inbound roaming situation, you have the MSC (VPLMN) in one village and the "authoritative" HLR for that subscriber (HPLMN) in another village. -- - Harald Welte <laforge at osmocom.org> http://laforge.gnumonks.org/ ============================================================================ "Privacy in residential applications is a desirable marketing option." (ETSI EN 300 175-7 Ch. A6)