This is merely a historical archive of years 2008-2021, before the migration to mailman3.
A maintained and still updated list archive can be found at https://lists.osmocom.org/hyperkitty/list/OpenBSC@lists.osmocom.org/.
Sandi Suhendro djks74 at gmail.comOK, Thanks alot Vadim. :-) will try to debug and will keep report. Thanks. DUO On Tue, Jan 9, 2018 at 12:32 AM, Vadim Yanitskiy <axilirator at gmail.com> wrote: > Let's keep the public conversation, > there are no secrets, right? ;) > > > Here is the pcap attached and here is the osmo-nitb > > log https://pastebin.com/NJa0YU08 > > > > here is the osmo-bts log https://pastebin.com/RZ0au5yA > > > > hope you know what is wrong. Thanks > > Have a look at the following log lines: > > > trx_if.c:217 Enqueuing TRX control command 'CMD NOHANDOVER 0 0' > > ... > > trx_if.c:371 Response message: 'RSP NOHANDOVER -1' > > trx_if.c:403 transceiver (phy0.0) rejected TRX command > > with response: 'RSP NOHANDOVER -1' > > bts.c:208 Shutting down BTS 0, Reason TRX-CTRL-MSG: CRITICAL > > For some reason, the OsmocomBB transceiver rejects the command. > Despite it's implemented and should work as expected. > > Let's look at the source code (trx.c:400 _trx_ctrl_cmd_(no)handover): > > > int n, tn, ss = 0; > > > > n = sscanf(args, "%d %d", &tn, &ss); > > > > if ((n < 1) || (tn < 0) || (tn > 7) || (ss < 0) || ((ss > 8))) > > return _trx_ctrl_send_resp(trx, cmd, "%d %d %d", -1, tn, ss); > > > > // ... > > Try to debug this condition on your side. > I cannot reproduce your problem... > > With best regards, > Vadim Yanitskiy. > > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.osmocom.org/pipermail/openbsc/attachments/20180109/0095fcfe/attachment.htm>