This is merely a historical archive of years 2008-2021, before the migration to mailman3.
A maintained and still updated list archive can be found at https://lists.osmocom.org/hyperkitty/list/OpenBSC@lists.osmocom.org/.
Sandi Suhendro djks74 at gmail.comHi Norbertas, Im wondering does your osmo-trx is running stable with LimeSDR? not having glitch or stop in the middle or send timed out? if yes, I assume it was osmo-trx still having problem.... im very curious if you using latest osmo-trx and stable. The other problem also your configuration. you need to give details. DUO On Thu, Feb 15, 2018 at 12:40 AM, Norbertas Kremeris <n.kremeris at live.com> wrote: > Hello all, > > I have run into some problems while building and running osmo-nitb, > osmo-bts-trx and osmo-trx on Ubuntu 16.04. I am trying to create a > self-contained gsm network box. I have successfully built libosmocore, > libosmo-abis, libosmo-netif, libosmo-sccp, openbsc, osmo-bts and osmo-trx > all from git sources, and i am also using linux call router. All make > checks pass corrently without issues. > > As for the SDR side, i am have the latest UHD, SoapySDR and SoapyUHD, and > latest LimeSuite library for LimeSDR support. > > SMS send/receive works correctly without any issues. Calling, however, > works neither with osmo-nitb as standalone, neither with osmo-nitb with -m > parameter + LCR. when trying to call, the receiving phone rings, but when > trying to answer it randomly either gets stuck and does not answer, drops > the call instantly or actually takes the call (and the elapsed seconds > counter starts counting), but all you can hear is random noises coming both > from the calling and from receiving phones, while the calling phone still > shows that the call has not been answered, as in still calling. > > this is the debug info from osmo-trx: > > <0000> rsl.c:606 (bts=0,trx=0,ts=2,ss=0) Tx CHAN ACT ACK > <0011> lapd_core.c:920 Store content res. (dl=0xb668cec8) > <0011> lapd_core.c:1556 N(S) sequence error: N(S)=0, V(R)=1 (dl=0xb668cec8 > state LAPD_STATE_MF_EST) > <0011> lapd_core.c:1556 N(S) sequence error: N(S)=0, V(R)=1 (dl=0xb668cec8 > state LAPD_STATE_MF_EST) > <0011> lapd_core.c:1556 N(S) sequence error: N(S)=1, V(R)=2 (dl=0xb668cec8 > state LAPD_STATE_MF_EST) > <0011> lapd_core.c:1556 N(S) sequence error: N(S)=1, V(R)=2 (dl=0xb668cec8 > state LAPD_STATE_MF_EST) > <0000> rsl.c:1639 CRCX does not specify a remote IP > <0000> rsl.c:1646 CRCX does not specify a remote port > <0000> rsl.c:1650 speech mode: 16 > <0000> rsl.c:1656 payload type: 3 > <0000> rsl.c:1636 connect_ip 16777343 > <0000> rsl.c:1643 connect_port 12405 > <0000> rsl.c:1650 speech mode: 0 > <0000> rsl.c:1656 payload type: 3 > <0009> pcu_sock.c:668 PCU socket not connected, dropping message > <0011> lapd_core.c:1556 N(S) sequence error: N(S)=2, V(R)=3 (dl=0xb668cec8 > state LAPD_STATE_MF_EST) > <0011> lapd_core.c:1556 N(S) sequence error: N(S)=2, V(R)=3 (dl=0xb668cec8 > state LAPD_STATE_MF_EST) > <0009> pcu_sock.c:668 PCU socket not connected, dropping message > <0009> pcu_sock.c:668 PCU socket not connected, dropping message > <0009> pcu_sock.c:668 PCU socket not connected, dropping message > <0000> rsl.c:606 (bts=0,trx=0,ts=3,ss=0) Tx CHAN ACT ACK > <000e> l1sap.c:96 RTP clock out of sync with lower layer: 2080 vs 160 > (2291865->2291921) > <0011> lapd_core.c:920 Store content res. (dl=0xb66a83dc) > <0011> lapd_core.c:1556 N(S) sequence error: N(S)=0, V(R)=1 (dl=0xb66a83dc > state LAPD_STATE_MF_EST) > <0011> lapd_core.c:1556 N(S) sequence error: N(S)=0, V(R)=1 (dl=0xb66a83dc > state LAPD_STATE_MF_EST) > <0000> rsl.c:1639 CRCX does not specify a remote IP > <0000> rsl.c:1646 CRCX does not specify a remote port > <0000> rsl.c:1650 speech mode: 16 > <0000> rsl.c:1656 payload type: 3 > <0011> lapd_core.c:1556 N(S) sequence error: N(S)=1, V(R)=2 (dl=0xb66a83dc > state LAPD_STATE_MF_EST) > <0011> lapd_core.c:1556 N(S) sequence error: N(S)=1, V(R)=2 (dl=0xb66a83dc > state LAPD_STATE_MF_EST) > <0011> lapd_core.c:1556 N(S) sequence error: N(S)=2, V(R)=3 (dl=0xb66a83dc > state LAPD_STATE_MF_EST) > <000e> l1sap.c:96 RTP clock out of sync with lower layer: 82594400 vs 160 > (2292212->2292182) > <0011> lapd_core.c:1556 N(S) sequence error: N(S)=2, V(R)=3 (dl=0xb66a83dc > state LAPD_STATE_MF_EST) > <000e> l1sap.c:96 RTP clock out of sync with lower layer: 1440 vs 160 > (2292208->2292246) > <000e> l1sap.c:96 RTP clock out of sync with lower layer: 82594240 vs 160 > (2292246->2292212) > <0000> rsl.c:1636 connect_ip 16777343 > <0000> rsl.c:1643 connect_port 12917 > <0000> rsl.c:1650 speech mode: 0 > <0000> rsl.c:1656 payload type: 3 > <0011> lapd_core.c:1556 N(S) sequence error: N(S)=3, V(R)=4 (dl=0xb66a83dc > state LAPD_STATE_MF_EST) > <0011> lapd_core.c:1556 N(S) sequence error: N(S)=3, V(R)=4 (dl=0xb66a83dc > state LAPD_STATE_MF_EST) > <000e> l1sap.c:96 RTP clock out of sync with lower layer: 2080 vs 160 > (2292814->2292870) > <000e> l1sap.c:96 RTP clock out of sync with lower layer: 82594240 vs 160 > (2293165->2293131) > <000e> l1sap.c:96 RTP clock out of sync with lower layer: 1600 vs 160 > (2293178->2293221) > <000e> l1sap.c:96 RTP clock out of sync with lower layer: 82594400 vs 160 > (2293221->2293191) > <000e> l1sap.c:96 RTP clock out of sync with lower layer: 1440 vs 160 > (2293200->2293239) > <000e> l1sap.c:96 RTP clock out of sync with lower layer: 82594240 vs 160 > (2293239->2293204) > <000e> l1sap.c:96 RTP clock out of sync with lower layer: 1600 vs 160 > (2293404->2293447) > <000e> l1sap.c:96 RTP clock out of sync with lower layer: 82594400 vs 160 > (2293447->2293417) > <000e> l1sap.c:96 RTP clock out of sync with lower layer: 1440 vs 160 > (2293417->2293455) > <000e> l1sap.c:96 RTP clock out of sync with lower layer: 82594240 vs 160 > (2293455->2293421) > <000e> l1sap.c:96 RTP clock out of sync with lower layer: 1600 vs 160 > (2293443->2293486) > <000e> l1sap.c:96 RTP clock out of sync with lower layer: 82594400 vs 160 > (2293486->2293456) > <000e> l1sap.c:96 RTP clock out of sync with lower layer: 1440 vs 160 > (2293469->2293507) > <000e> l1sap.c:96 RTP clock out of sync with lower layer: 82594240 vs 160 > (2293507->2293473) > <000e> l1sap.c:96 RTP clock out of sync with lower layer: 1600 vs 160 > (2293677->2293720) > <000e> l1sap.c:96 RTP clock out of sync with lower layer: 82594080 vs 160 > (2293720->2293681) > <000e> l1sap.c:96 RTP clock out of sync with lower layer: 1600 vs 160 > (2293789->2293832) > <000e> l1sap.c:96 RTP clock out of sync with lower layer: 82594080 vs 160 > (2293832->2293794) > <000e> l1sap.c:96 RTP clock out of sync with lower layer: 1760 vs 160 > (2293967->2294014) > <000e> l1sap.c:96 RTP clock out of sync with lower layer: 82594400 vs 160 > (2294014->2293984) > <000e> l1sap.c:96 RTP clock out of sync with lower layer: 1440 vs 160 > (2293989->2294027) > <000e> l1sap.c:96 RTP clock out of sync with lower layer: 82594240 vs 160 > (2294027->2293993) > <000e> l1sap.c:96 RTP clock out of sync with lower layer: 1600 vs 160 > (2294240->2294283) > <000e> l1sap.c:96 RTP clock out of sync with lower layer: 82594400 vs 160 > (2294283->2294253) > <000e> l1sap.c:96 RTP clock out of sync with lower layer: 1440 vs 160 > (2294257->2294296) > <000e> l1sap.c:96 RTP clock out of sync with lower layer: 82594240 vs 160 > (2294296->2294262) > <000e> l1sap.c:96 RTP clock out of sync with lower layer: 1600 vs 160 > (2294262->2294305) > <000e> l1sap.c:96 RTP clock out of sync with lower layer: 82594080 vs 160 > (2294305->2294266) > <000e> l1sap.c:96 RTP clock out of sync with lower layer: 1760 vs 160 > (2294283->2294331) > <000e> l1sap.c:96 RTP clock out of sync with lower layer: 82594240 vs 160 > (2294331->2294296) > <000e> l1sap.c:96 RTP clock out of sync with lower layer: 480 vs 160 > (2294318->2294331) > <000e> l1sap.c:96 RTP clock out of sync with lower layer: 1440 vs 160 > (2294335->2294374) > <000e> l1sap.c:96 RTP clock out of sync with lower layer: 82594240 vs 160 > (2294374->2294340) > <000e> l1sap.c:96 RTP clock out of sync with lower layer: 1600 vs 160 > (2294409->2294452) > <000e> l1sap.c:96 RTP clock out of sync with lower layer: 82594080 vs 160 > (2294452->2294413) > <000e> l1sap.c:96 RTP clock out of sync with lower layer: 1760 vs 160 > (2294929->2294976) > <000e> l1sap.c:96 RTP clock out of sync with lower layer: 82594400 vs 160 > (2294976->2294946) > <000e> l1sap.c:96 RTP clock out of sync with lower layer: 1440 vs 160 > (2294951->2294989) > <000e> l1sap.c:96 RTP clock out of sync with lower layer: 82594240 vs 160 > (2294989->2294955) > <0000> rsl.c:689 (bts=0,trx=0,ts=2,ss=0) Sending Connection Failure: cause > = 0x01 > <0011> lapdm.c:1144 ((nil)) RLL Message 'REL_REQ' received without LAPDm > context. (sapi 0) > <0000> rsl.c:1433 (bts=0,trx=0,ts=2,ss=0) Sending RTP delete indication: > cause = Normal event, unspecified > <0000> rsl.c:580 (bts=0,trx=0,ts=2,ss=0) Tx RF CHAN REL ACK > <000e> l1sap.c:96 RTP clock out of sync with lower layer: 1600 vs 160 > (2295705->2295748) > <000e> l1sap.c:96 RTP clock out of sync with lower layer: 82594240 vs 160 > (2295752->2295718) > <000e> l1sap.c:96 RTP clock out of sync with lower layer: 1600 vs 160 > (2295817->2295860) > <000e> l1sap.c:96 RTP clock out of sync with lower layer: 82594240 vs 160 > (2295869->2295835) > <000e> l1sap.c:96 RTP clock out of sync with lower layer: 1600 vs 160 > (2295960->2296003) > <000e> l1sap.c:96 RTP clock out of sync with lower layer: 82594400 vs 160 > (2296003->2295973) > <000e> l1sap.c:96 RTP clock out of sync with lower layer: 1440 vs 160 > (2295978->2296016) > <000e> l1sap.c:96 RTP clock out of sync with lower layer: 82594240 vs 160 > (2296016->2295982) > <000e> l1sap.c:96 RTP clock out of sync with lower layer: 1600 vs 160 > (2296030->2296073) > <000e> l1sap.c:96 RTP clock out of sync with lower layer: 82594240 vs 160 > (2296077->2296043) > <0000> rsl.c:689 (bts=0,trx=0,ts=3,ss=0) Sending Connection Failure: cause > = 0x01 > <0011> lapdm.c:1144 ((nil)) RLL Message 'REL_REQ' received without LAPDm > context. (sapi 0) > <0000> rsl.c:1433 (bts=0,trx=0,ts=3,ss=0) Sending RTP delete indication: > cause = Normal event, unspecified > <0000> rsl.c:580 (bts=0,trx=0,ts=3,ss=0) Tx RF CHAN REL ACK > > > osmo-nitb -c config.cfg -C -m -P > > <0004> abis_rsl.c:1852 BTS 0 CHAN RQD: reason: call re-establishment > (ra=0x4f, neci=0x01, chreq_reason=0x02) > <000a> bsc_api.c:415 Sending (bts=0,trx=0,ts=2,ss=0) ChanModify for > speech: SPEECH_V1 on channel TCH_F > <0004> abis_rsl.c:1852 BTS 0 CHAN RQD: reason: answer to paging (ra=0x27, > neci=0x01, chreq_reason=0x01) > <000a> bsc_api.c:415 Sending (bts=0,trx=0,ts=3,ss=0) ChanModify for > speech: SPEECH_V1 on channel TCH_F > <0004> abis_rsl.c:1358 (bts=0,trx=0,ts=2,ss=0) CONNECTION FAIL: RELEASING > state ACTIVE CAUSE=0x01(Radio Link Failure) > <0004> abis_rsl.c:1358 (bts=0,trx=0,ts=3,ss=0) CONNECTION FAIL: RELEASING > state ACTIVE CAUSE=0x01(Radio Link Failure) > > > > > versions of software: > > > osmo-nitb --version > OpenBSC version 1.0.0.14-98a2ba > > ~/Desktop/osmo/openbsc$ git log -1 > commit 98a2ba4c57e95d2ce1e1e8147ea5a8d51788a191 > Author: Vadim Yanitskiy <axilirator at gmail.com> <axilirator at gmail.com> > Date: Wed Jan 10 22:25:17 2018 +0600 > > > ((*)) > | > / \ OsmoBTS > OsmoBTS version 0.7.0.77-54be > > ~/Desktop/osmo/osmo-bts$ git log -1 > commit 54be46949e93e07e9e57b706388ebb832e5fad0a > Author: Pau Espin Pedrol <pespin at sysmocom.de> <pespin at sysmocom.de> > Date: Fri Feb 9 12:08:38 2018 +0100 > > > osmo trx: > > ~/Desktop/osmo/osmo-trx$ git log -1 > commit 77ce99ac6720896f504a0581a5c57b2929a13cef > Author: Pau Espin Pedrol <pespin at sysmocom.de> <pespin at sysmocom.de> > Date: Mon Feb 5 13:05:06 2018 +0100 > > > older osmo-bts-trx does actually work at least somewhat, but then voice > transmission stops after 10-20 seconds, or sometimes even after 4 minutes > of talking, while . The older version is: > > commit 9982b95069c58a3cb9b97bb6bc75932db81886ad > Author: Harald Welte <laforge at gnumonks.org> <laforge at gnumonks.org> > Date: Tue Oct 24 18:42:30 2017 +0200 > > "OsmoBTS version 0.6.0.21-9982b-dirty" > > I would, however, like to use a newer, preferably the master branch > version from git. > > Any help in dealing with this issue would be very greatly appreciated. > > > > > -- Best Regards, DUO -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.osmocom.org/pipermail/openbsc/attachments/20180215/c30e2f4c/attachment.htm>