nano3g ip.access femtocells and transcoding

This is merely a historical archive of years 2008-2021, before the migration to mailman3.

A maintained and still updated list archive can be found at https://lists.osmocom.org/hyperkitty/list/OpenBSC@lists.osmocom.org/.

Sandi Suhendro djks74 at gmail.com
Fri Dec 14 10:05:04 UTC 2018


Dear Mykola,
PBX (like asterisk) not support amr, try using TCHF/TCHH (not AMR).

see this : https://community.asterisk.org/t/support-for-amr-codec/73659

hope this help!

On Fri, Dec 14, 2018 at 4:51 PM Mykola Shchetinin <mykola at kingmuffin.com>
wrote:

> Dear Osmocom community,
>
> Did somebody try to use nano3g ip.access femtocells and Osmocom system with
> external call handling? What I am trying to do is to make calls work
> between
> VoIP phones connected to PBX and UEs connected to Osmocom system. I've
> tried two
> PBXs: Kamailio with rtpengine and Asterisk. Signalling worked good between
> VoIP
> phone and UE with both PBXs; calls between two UEs registered on Osmocom
> system
> worked good also... But I fail to do transcoding (calls between VoIP phone
> and
> UE). The problem is that it is unknown which codec is used by nano3g
> ip.access
> femtocell.
>
> So, the question is: Do you know what codecs were used for speech in your
> setup
> with nano3g ip.access femtocells? Or do you know how to find out that
> information? (It was stated by ip.access that they use AMR but I failed to
> match
> AMR specs with RTP payload that was sent by femtocell...).
>
> I would be very grateful for any ideas.
>
> Kind regards, Mykola
>


-- 
Best Regards,
Sandi
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osmocom.org/pipermail/openbsc/attachments/20181214/88849af3/attachment.htm>


More information about the OpenBSC mailing list