This is merely a historical archive of years 2008-2021, before the migration to mailman3.
A maintained and still updated list archive can be found at https://lists.osmocom.org/hyperkitty/list/OpenBSC@lists.osmocom.org/.
Harald Welte laforge at gnumonks.orgHi Neels,
On Mon, Oct 23, 2017 at 03:54:40AM +0200, Neels Hofmeyr wrote:
> Ah, damn. I checked all of the repositories I know to use the VTY, I didn't
> imagine that OsmocomBB also has a VTY. That's really my fault then.
I think in general we should not fall into that trap. We have *no clue* at all
who might be using libosmo* for whatever purpose. If we provide a libary with
a given API/ABI, then it's our responsibility to keep that ABI/API as stable as
possible.
I understand that it was hardly possible without fall-out in that particular
case, and for sure there are exceptions.
However, completely unrelated to this particular topic (and hence the Cc
to openbsc@) I'm not happy in general with the way how "carlessly" we
sometimes introduce breakage. We have to be more disciplined in general
on this. All of us.
BTW: The fact that this change has gone into master without being
noticed also means that possibly we're not modelling osmocom-bb as a
downstream user of libosmocore that needs to be rebuilt (and at least
checked if it starts up correctly?) whenever testing a libosmocore
change. That's also something to investigate. Maybe there's some way
we can test this without too much effort.
Regards,
Harald
--
- Harald Welte <laforge at gnumonks.org> http://laforge.gnumonks.org/
============================================================================
"Privacy in residential applications is a desirable marketing option."
(ETSI EN 300 175-7 Ch. A6)