OsmoBTS -> libosmogsm code migration

This is merely a historical archive of years 2008-2021, before the migration to mailman3.

A maintained and still updated list archive can be found at https://lists.osmocom.org/hyperkitty/list/OpenBSC@lists.osmocom.org/.

Tom Tsou tom at tsou.cc
Wed Oct 12 18:54:50 UTC 2016


On Wed, Oct 12, 2016 at 10:58 AM, Max <msuraev at sysmocom.de> wrote:
> Is there some microbenchmark available? Perhaps we can use it to improve
> generated code?

Potential Viterbi optimization using SIMD methods is substantial as I
demonstrated many years ago. The implementation does require
separation of puncturing and Viterbi. Unfortunately, the has code
experienced code rot since then. Admittedly, I accept much of that
blame.

=================================================
[+] Testing: GSM TCH/AFS 6.7
[.] Specs: (N=4, K=5, recursive, flushed, punctured)
[.] Input length  : ret = 140  exp = 140 -> OK
[.] Output length : ret = 448  exp = 448 -> OK

[.] Performance benchmark:
[..] Encoding / Decoding 800000 bursts on 8 thread(s):
[..] Testing base:
[..] Elapsed time....................... 4.320001 secs
[..] Rate............................... 25.925920 Mbps
[..] Testing SIMD:
[..] Elapsed time....................... 0.458272 secs
[..] Rate............................... 244.396341 Mbps
[..] Speedup............................ 9.426718

http://lists.osmocom.org/pipermail/openbsc/2014-April/007365.html

  -TT



More information about the OpenBSC mailing list