Change in osmo-iuh[master]: attempt to fix parallel build, improve AM logic

This is merely a historical archive of years 2008-2021, before the migration to mailman3.

A maintained and still updated list archive can be found at https://lists.osmocom.org/hyperkitty/list/OpenBSC@lists.osmocom.org/.

Neels Hofmeyr nhofmeyr at sysmocom.de
Mon May 23 10:47:31 UTC 2016


This patch has been merged last week, but...

On Sun, May 15, 2016 at 11:44:10AM +0000, gerrit-no-reply at lists.osmocom.org wrote:
> --- a/include/osmocom/ranap/ranap_ies_defs.h
> +++ /dev/null
> @@ -1,2967 +0,0 @@
> -/*******************************************************************************
> - * This file had been created by asn1tostruct.py script v0.5osmo1
> - * Please do not modify this file but regenerate it via script.
> - * Created on: 2016-02-19 16:51:41.625903 by daniel
> - * from ['../asn1//ranap/RANAP-PDU-Contents.asn']
> - ******************************************************************************/
> -#include <osmocom/ranap/ranap_common.h>
> -

I assumed we wanted the ranap_ies_defs.h file to be committed.  It is
generated automatically, yes, but IMHO it is a good idea to track the
changes in the generated code.

By having a gen_ranap.stamp, every clean checkout would first regenerate
the ranap_ies_defs.h. That would generally be fine to verify that we still
have the same ranap_ies_defs.h, except for the comment on top:

    * Created on: 2016-02-19 16:51:41.625903 by daniel

If re-adding the ranap_ies_defs.h to git, we'd also want to drop
generation of that line from the py script and leave the change tracking
up to git.

Am I making sense or should I just drop this?

~Neels

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 819 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.osmocom.org/pipermail/openbsc/attachments/20160523/989090ca/attachment.bin>


More information about the OpenBSC mailing list