This is merely a historical archive of years 2008-2021, before the migration to mailman3.
A maintained and still updated list archive can be found at https://lists.osmocom.org/hyperkitty/list/OpenBSC@lists.osmocom.org/.
Max msuraev at sysmocom.deI think such comments usually require context in a form of patch diff so interested person got to go to gerrit anyway so there's not much sense in duplicating them into ML. On 06/21/2016 01:24 PM, Neels Hofmeyr wrote: > I am a bit ambiguous on our use of comments in gerrit. > > We do discuss at least some fairly interesting things in the comments on > patches waiting for approval in gerrit. > > When these discussions are attempted on openbsc@ or osmocom-net-gprs@, you > tend to block off and redirect the discussion back to the gerrit comments > infrastructure. > > However, we have moved the gerrit mails to a separate and very noisy > mailing list, and these potentially interesting discussions are moved > essentially out of the public focus. > > Also, if we in future would like to investigate discussion on some topic, > we need to search both the main ML and the gerrit ML. > > IMHO it would make sense to copy the human originated comments to our > "human" mailing lists, so that the automatic jenkins and gerrit > notifications remain on the noisy ML while we see all discussions here. > > Is that easy to achieve (filter on originator of comment), > and would you guys agree? > > ~Neels > -- Max Suraev <msuraev at sysmocom.de> http://www.sysmocom.de/ ======================================================================= * sysmocom - systems for mobile communications GmbH * Alt-Moabit 93 * 10559 Berlin, Germany * Sitz / Registered office: Berlin, HRB 134158 B * Geschaeftsfuehrer / Managing Director: Harald Welte