Regression in osmo-pcu with UHD trx ?

This is merely a historical archive of years 2008-2021, before the migration to mailman3.

A maintained and still updated list archive can be found at https://lists.osmocom.org/hyperkitty/list/OpenBSC@lists.osmocom.org/.

Neels Hofmeyr nhofmeyr at sysmocom.de
Thu Jun 16 11:43:44 UTC 2016


On Wed, Jun 15, 2016 at 06:03:29PM -0700, Tom Tsou wrote:
> On Mon, May 30, 2016 at 2:58 AM, Saurabh Sharan
> <Saurabh.Sharan at radisys.com> wrote:
> >> Date: Fri, 27 May 2016 18:02:28 +0200
> >> From: Pierre Baudry <pierre.baudry at diateam.net>
> >> I noticed that since several weeks that osmo-pcu did not work as good as
> >> previously.
> >
> > Yes we have also seen similar failures for GPRS calls in the osmo-pcu. Our setup uses NuRAN hardware with osmo-bts-sysmo
> 
> I can confirm the same behaviour on B200 using master branches of
> osmo-pcu, osmo-bts-trx, and osmo-trx.
> 
> >> The latest "good" revision I am aware of is commit
> >> d87e1d6ab747423d3668c74d16201a5d967accf0 (2015/12/14)
> 
> Confirm.

Maybe related: I have recently found osmo-pcu master to not work for ip.access
nanobts (and probably for all BTS models) and traced it to commit
f1a7b8f tbf: Add state WAIT_ASSIGN

See https://gerrit.osmocom.org/218

We still have to come to a conclusion on whether we want to merge the revert.
If anyone is aware of this, any details would be appreciated.

Thanks!

~Neels

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 819 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.osmocom.org/pipermail/openbsc/attachments/20160616/308c8ee6/attachment.bin>


More information about the OpenBSC mailing list