This is merely a historical archive of years 2008-2021, before the migration to mailman3.
A maintained and still updated list archive can be found at https://lists.osmocom.org/hyperkitty/list/OpenBSC@lists.osmocom.org/.
Arran Cudbard-Bell a.cudbardb at freeradius.org> On Jun 1, 2016, at 12:01 PM, Max <msuraev at sysmocom.de> wrote: > > Hi. > > I don't think hasty decisions would benefit anyone. Personally I favor > gerrit over patchwork because it's easier for me to grab particular > patch, fix it and than send back for review with gerrit taking care of > versioning, jenkins (re)test etc. I also have an impression that gerrit > gives better overview of awaiting patches which decrease the chance that > some patch would be "lost" in ML. +1 If you're not going to be convinced to transition to evil proprietary closed software, Gerrit is pretty nice for patch submitters and does seem to offer good CI integration and overviews. There are some serious advantages to GitHub, beyond ease of use and efficiency though. You can see where we transitioned (Early 2010) from just mailing list patches to using GitHub. https://www.openhub.net/p/freeradius (See contributors Per Month graph) -Arran Arran Cudbard-Bell <a.cudbardb at freeradius.org> FreeRADIUS Development Team FD31 3077 42EC 7FCD 32FE 5EE2 56CF 27F9 30A8 CAA2 -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 842 bytes Desc: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail URL: <http://lists.osmocom.org/pipermail/openbsc/attachments/20160601/3bfd386c/attachment.bin>