This is merely a historical archive of years 2008-2021, before the migration to mailman3.
A maintained and still updated list archive can be found at https://lists.osmocom.org/hyperkitty/list/OpenBSC@lists.osmocom.org/.
Max msuraev at sysmocom.deThat's probably related to https://gerrit.osmocom.org/#/c/427/3
If that's really the case than fix would be to check for is_11bit of
ph_rach_ind_param and adjust length accordingly.
On 07/25/2016 12:22 PM, Neels Hofmeyr wrote:
> I just came across this compiler warning:
>
> l1sap.c: In function 'gsmtap_ph_rach':
> l1sap.c:291:8: warning: assignment from incompatible pointer type [enabled by default]
> *data = &l1sap->u.rach_ind.ra;
> ^
>
> It's a
> uint16_t ra
> and used like this in common/l1sap.c:
>
> static int gsmtap_ph_rach(struct osmo_phsap_prim *l1sap, uint8_t *chan_type,
> uint8_t *tn, uint8_t *ss, uint32_t *fn, uint8_t **data, int *len)
> {
> [...]
> *data = &l1sap->u.rach_ind.ra;
> *len = 1;
>
> A cast like this would fix the compiler warning and make sense if data is
> interpreted to point at a 16 bit data block, probably in host byte order
> though:
>
> *data = (uint8_t*)&l1sap->u.rach_ind.ra;
> *len = 1;
>
> But *len = 1 means that **data is an 8bit value?
> This is sent to gsmtap.
>
> Is *len = 1 something we should fix?
>
> ~Neels
>
>
--
Max Suraev <msuraev at sysmocom.de> http://www.sysmocom.de/
=======================================================================
* sysmocom - systems for mobile communications GmbH
* Alt-Moabit 93
* 10559 Berlin, Germany
* Sitz / Registered office: Berlin, HRB 134158 B
* Geschaeftsfuehrer / Managing Director: Harald Welte