This is merely a historical archive of years 2008-2021, before the migration to mailman3.
A maintained and still updated list archive can be found at https://lists.osmocom.org/hyperkitty/list/OpenBSC@lists.osmocom.org/.
Neels Hofmeyr nhofmeyr at sysmocom.deOn Thu, Jul 14, 2016 at 02:40:10AM +0200, Harald Welte wrote: > Hi Alexander and others, > > On Wed, Jul 13, 2016 at 04:59:11PM -0400, Alexander Chemeris wrote: > > > phys_chan_config TCH/F_TCH/H_PDCH > > > > I personally prefer this option, because it doesn't leave a place for > > doubt. > > I also think it should be kept this way for consistency with other pchan > names. Agreed. I thought, maybe we want to add more pchan types so having a shorter DYN name could be useful. But having a consistent, explicit, logical name is better. > From a VTY syntax POV, the '/' are ugly in the name Yeah, especially since it looks like "TCH or F_TCH or H_PDCH" :) But one gets used to it quickly. ~Neels -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 819 bytes Desc: Digital signature URL: <http://lists.osmocom.org/pipermail/openbsc/attachments/20160714/64542826/attachment.bin>