This is merely a historical archive of years 2008-2021, before the migration to mailman3.
A maintained and still updated list archive can be found at https://lists.osmocom.org/hyperkitty/list/OpenBSC@lists.osmocom.org/.
Neels Hofmeyr nhofmeyr at sysmocom.deOn Wed, Dec 14, 2016 at 10:15:32AM +0100, Harald Welte wrote: > > At risk of bikeshedding, how about "OsmoCon" as a name for the entire > > event, with OsmoDevCon remaining the usual developer-only portion? > > Good point. Unfortunately OSmocomBB already has an 'osmocon' program > (the osmocom console program). Though the context should make it hard > to mix-up, the programmer in me likes to not overload the global > namespace ;) I really like the name "OsmoCon" as such, and unless people run on FAT OsmoCon and osmocon are different names? :) On the meta meaning side, we're dropping from "Osmocom" the "com" part which means "communication", which is actually the most important part of the conference. OsmocomCon? OsmoComm? as in Osmocom Communication Conference... No idea. OsmoCon still has the nicest ring to it. Interestingly enough, there doesn't seem to be a naming conflict with events on chemical or biological topics (osmosis)... ~N -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 819 bytes Desc: Digital signature URL: <http://lists.osmocom.org/pipermail/openbsc/attachments/20161214/abc19079/attachment.bin>