RFC: removing talloc for good?

This is merely a historical archive of years 2008-2021, before the migration to mailman3.

A maintained and still updated list archive can be found at https://lists.osmocom.org/hyperkitty/list/OpenBSC@lists.osmocom.org/.

Harald Welte laforge at gnumonks.org
Sat Nov 21 19:18:38 UTC 2015


Hi Holger,

On Sat, Nov 21, 2015 at 03:50:24PM +0000, Holger Freyther wrote:
> no, have you seen Jan Engelhardt's changes?

I didn't remember them, no :/

But in any case, your mail was not a response to my question.  What do
you think about it?

> I think we should remove <osmocom/core/talloc.h> at the same time.

I think we should keep it as a convenience wrapper just containing a
single line of "#include <talloc.h>".  _maybe_ with a #warning together. 

This makes sense for people wanting to build e.g. older branches with
new libosmocore.  That wrapper-header doesn't hurt and helps people
avoid broken builds.

-- 
- Harald Welte <laforge at gnumonks.org>           http://laforge.gnumonks.org/
============================================================================
"Privacy in residential applications is a desirable marketing option."
                                                  (ETSI EN 300 175-7 Ch. A6)



More information about the OpenBSC mailing list