This is merely a historical archive of years 2008-2021, before the migration to mailman3.
A maintained and still updated list archive can be found at https://lists.osmocom.org/hyperkitty/list/OpenBSC@lists.osmocom.org/.
Holger Hans Peter Freyther holger at freyther.deOn Thu, Oct 23, 2014 at 05:59:32PM +0200, Peter Stuge wrote: > How come it has higher rank? > > I don't have the spec, maybe it is stated explicitly there, but this > blog post (it's on the internet so it MUST be true!) outlines rules > based on the standard, and doesn't mention either size_t type. #include <stdint.h> #include <sys/socket.h> #include <stdint.h> int foo() { unsigned int foo = 1212323123123; size_t bla = 2; typeof(foo - bla) k; k = 3; } clang-3.4 -Xclang -ast-dump -fsyntax-only foo.c `-FunctionDecl 0x9946300 </tmp/foo.c:5:1, line:12:1> foo 'int ()' `-CompoundStmt 0x9946588 <line:6:1, line:12:1> |-DeclStmt 0x99463c8 <line:7:2, col:34> | `-VarDecl 0x9946370 <col:2, col:21> foo 'unsigned int' | `-ImplicitCastExpr 0x99463b8 <col:21> 'unsigned int' <IntegralCast> | `-IntegerLiteral 0x99463a0 <col:21> 'long long' 1212323123123 |-DeclStmt 0x9946438 <line:8:2, col:16> | `-VarDecl 0x99463e0 <col:2, col:15> bla 'size_t':'unsigned int' | `-ImplicitCastExpr 0x9946428 <col:15> 'size_t':'unsigned int' <IntegralCast> | `-IntegerLiteral 0x9946410 <col:15> 'int' 2 |-DeclStmt 0x9946520 <line:10:2, col:21> | `-VarDecl 0x99464f0 <col:2, col:20> k 'typeof (foo - bla)':'unsigned int' `-BinaryOperator 0x9946570 <line:11:2, col:6> 'typeof (foo - bla)':'unsigned int' '=' |-DeclRefExpr 0x9946530 <col:2> 'typeof (foo - bla)':'unsigned int' lvalue Var 0x99464f0 'k' 'typeof (foo - bla)':'unsigned int' `-ImplicitCastExpr 0x9946560 <col:6> 'typeof (foo - bla)':'unsigned int' <IntegralCast> `-IntegerLiteral 0x9946548 <col:6> 'int' 3 If I read this correctly the type is 'unsigned int' with clang? An issue with my reading? Clang bug? cheers holger