This is merely a historical archive of years 2008-2021, before the migration to mailman3.
A maintained and still updated list archive can be found at https://lists.osmocom.org/hyperkitty/list/OpenBSC@lists.osmocom.org/.
Holger Hans Peter Freyther holger at freyther.deOn Thu, Jul 03, 2014 at 01:28:14PM +0200, Jacob Erlbeck wrote: Good Evening Jacob, > + int old_local_mcc = state->local_mcc; > + int old_local_mnc = state->local_mnc; make the above two const please. > + if (old_local_mcc != state->local_mcc || > + old_local_mnc != state->local_mnc) > + LOGP(DGPRS, LOGL_NOTICE, > + "Patching RAID %sactivated, msg: %s, " > + "local: %d-%d, core: %d-%d, to %s\n", > + state->local_mcc || state->local_mnc ? > + "" : "de", > + log_text, > + state->local_mcc, state->local_mnc, > + gbcfg.core_mcc, gbcfg.core_mnc, > + to_bss ? "BSS" : "SGSN"); > + > + if (state->local_mcc || state->local_mnc) { What does this extra check/message bring to the table? Why is it a notice? > + /* fix BSSGP */ > + bssgp_tlv_parse(&tp, data, data_len); What exactly is fixed here? > -struct gbproxy_config gbcfg; > +struct gbproxy_config gbcfg = {0}; We were lucky before or did the gbcfg end in the BSS before the patch as well? > +#define GBPROXY_CORE_MNC_STR "Use this network code for the backbone\n" No idea if "core-network" is any better.