[PATCH] rsl: Implement handling of rsl Delete Ind message

This is merely a historical archive of years 2008-2021, before the migration to mailman3.

A maintained and still updated list archive can be found at https://lists.osmocom.org/hyperkitty/list/OpenBSC@lists.osmocom.org/.

Alexander Chemeris alexander.chemeris at gmail.com
Tue Feb 18 08:41:58 UTC 2014


18 февр. 2014 г. 11:02 пользователь "Holger Hans Peter Freyther" <
holger at freyther.de> написал:
>
> On Mon, Feb 17, 2014 at 04:50:42PM +0400, Ivan Kluchnikov wrote:
>
> Good Morning,
>
> > +             llist_for_each_entry(cur_trx, &trx->bts->trx_list, list) {
> > +                     if (cur_trx->arfcn == arfcn) {
>
> I wondered if we want to compare the access reference as well? We do not
> enforce that the ARFCNs of a TRX are distinct.

Actually I think we should rather start enforcing that. Or do you know
situations when both TRX's could run on the same ARFCN?

> And besides that I would
> like you to move the look-up code to a separate function. That way we can
> at least write a unit test in the future.

+1

Please excuse typos. Written with a touchscreen keyboard.

--
Regards,
Alexander Chemeris
CEO/Founder Fairwaves LLC
http://fairwaves.ru
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osmocom.org/pipermail/openbsc/attachments/20140218/8ed3c864/attachment.htm>


More information about the OpenBSC mailing list