This is merely a historical archive of years 2008-2021, before the migration to mailman3.
A maintained and still updated list archive can be found at https://lists.osmocom.org/hyperkitty/list/OpenBSC@lists.osmocom.org/.
Alvaro Neira Ayuso anayuso at sysmocom.deOn Tue, Apr 29, 2014 at 09:14:07AM +0200, Holger Hans Peter Freyther wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 28, 2014 at 01:38:47PM +0200, Alvaro Neira Ayuso wrote:
> > From: Álvaro Neira Ayuso <anayuso at sysmocom.de>
>
> > --- a/openbsc/include/openbsc/gsm_data_shared.h
> > +++ b/openbsc/include/openbsc/gsm_data_shared.h
> > @@ -371,6 +371,7 @@ struct gsm_bts_trx {
> > uint16_t arfcn;
> > int nominal_power; /* in dBm */
> > unsigned int max_power_red; /* in actual dB */
> > + int power_reduce; /* in dBm */
>
> any reason to make it use int and not unsigned int? As this
> is a relative value the right unit is dB (take this with a
> grain of salt as I am just a software guy)
No, I don't have any reason for using int. But I have seen that that
it's better to use unsigned int because it's a little bit strange
accept to use negative values in a one attribute that we want to use
for reducing the power transmitter. I'm going to change that and send
you another version. Thanks Holger