This is merely a historical archive of years 2008-2021, before the migration to mailman3.
A maintained and still updated list archive can be found at https://lists.osmocom.org/hyperkitty/list/OpenBSC@lists.osmocom.org/.
Maicon Kist maicon.kist at inf.ufrgs.brThanks for you reply. I'm searching for the problem here, but is really hard for me. I captured some packets targeted to UDP port 4729. In this capture, I realize an USSD call. Whats bothering me is the packet number 37, the only with less than 83 bytes. Does anybody know if this may be a problem ? Thanks. On Sat, Sep 7, 2013 at 1:48 PM, Harald Welte <laforge at gnumonks.org> wrote: > Hi Maicon, > > I don't have much input, but: > > On Thu, Sep 05, 2013 at 09:41:19AM -0300, Maicon Kist wrote: > > I don't know how the OpenBSC works, but what it seems to me is that two > > separate threads are calling this fuction, maybe this is the problem ? Do > > you guys know what I can try to do next? > > OpenBSC (and much of osmocom software) is a single-thread event-loop > design, so there are no separete therads that are calling any function. > > -- > - Harald Welte <laforge at gnumonks.org> > http://laforge.gnumonks.org/ > > ============================================================================ > "Privacy in residential applications is a desirable marketing option." > (ETSI EN 300 175-7 Ch. > A6) > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.osmocom.org/pipermail/openbsc/attachments/20130907/4f27d039/attachment.htm> -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: port_4729.pcap Type: application/octet-stream Size: 15684 bytes Desc: not available URL: <http://lists.osmocom.org/pipermail/openbsc/attachments/20130907/4f27d039/attachment.obj>