This is merely a historical archive of years 2008-2021, before the migration to mailman3.
A maintained and still updated list archive can be found at https://lists.osmocom.org/hyperkitty/list/OpenBSC@lists.osmocom.org/.
noselasd at fiane.dyndns.org noselasd at fiane.dyndns.orgOn 10/08/2013 11:51 AM, Alexander Huemer wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 08, 2013 at 11:27:49AM +0200, Holger Hans Peter Freyther wrote:
>> On Sun, Oct 06, 2013 at 09:55:09PM +0200, Alexander Huemer wrote:
>>> Before the assigned value (0xFF) was truncated, reg->text[0] is of
>>> type char. A corresponding test for the same value in openbsc could
>>> only fail.
>>
>> Can you please explain?
>
> char is an signed 8bit type, so the maximum value is 0x7F. Well, at
> least usually. As I read, ANSI C does not dictate whether a variable
> declared as 'char' is signed or unsigned, gcc though defaults to signed.
> Excerpt from limits.h:
>
> [...]
> # define SCHAR_MAX 127
> [...]
> # ifdef __CHAR_UNSIGNED__ (this is not the case normally)
> [...]
> # define CHAR_MAX SCHAR_MAX
> [...]
>
> Example program:
>
> int main(void)
> {
> char c = 0xFF;
>
> if (c == 0xFF)
> return 0;
>
> return 1;
> }
And this is because:
char c = 0xff;
c == 0xff;
^^ ^^
| an int
|
promoted to int and sign extended in this expression
So it's really -1 == 255
c == (char)0xff; would be ok though