This is merely a historical archive of years 2008-2021, before the migration to mailman3.
A maintained and still updated list archive can be found at https://lists.osmocom.org/hyperkitty/list/OpenBSC@lists.osmocom.org/.
Holger Hans Peter Freyther holger at freyther.deOn Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 05:52:16PM +0200, Harald Welte wrote: > as an alternative, offer something like check_patch.pl of Linux kernel > to the developer, but which not only checks for indentation/coding style > but whihc also does the 'make check'. More reasonable and no > load/security on the server. I think it is a social problem, so no technological solution exists. I will add redundancy and reply somewhere else with similar content but from my point of view one should do the following on a branch before asking it to be merged: 1.) rebase against origin/master 2.) Do not mix too many concerns, so maybe create different patch series 3.) go through each change for sanity checking, check the commit message (if the problem fixed is properly described and if a drunk guy in at 10:00 am will understand and have enough context what was attempted to be fixed, I learned this with WebKit and re-learned it with the paging changes in OpenBSC.. so through my own failure) 4.) Make sure that each commit passes make and make check (distcheck) 5.) Ask things to be merged. So we are all humans and we sometimes don't do the above, sometimes we are lucky and it doesn't get noticed. But in case it is not I think the following should be a social norm: 1.) Fix it 2.) Apologize 3.) Promise to be more careful in the future and attempt to really do it cheers holger