Possible solution to ticket #55

This is merely a historical archive of years 2008-2021, before the migration to mailman3.

A maintained and still updated list archive can be found at https://lists.osmocom.org/hyperkitty/list/OpenBSC@lists.osmocom.org/.

VID - Frank Maas frank at vid.nl
Sun May 6 16:05:56 UTC 2012


Hello Holgor,

You are probably right, no, you are most certainly right.

However I was facing a rather strict deadline and found that (a)
people had reported this and (b) nobody had solved it. Using this
patch at least people can go forward in using and trying. When
creating this patch I saw that there is no proper line in when
"ownership" moves, i.e. who gets responsiblity for free'ing objects.
As said: my time was limited and I encountered this project only days
before making this patch. So I had no real possibility to really
change the core approach.

As I am not sure if we are going to follow through with this path, my
thoughts were to share this with you. One can make use of it (at least
over days SGSN no longer crashed), or (better) straighten up the code
and solve this. I hope it will help someone.

Regards,
Frank




More information about the OpenBSC mailing list