[PATCH 1/6] move header files in according directories

[Harald Welte]

Hi Alexander,

On Tue, Sep 06, 2011 at 12:21:56AM +0200, Alexander Huemer wrote:

> On Mon, Sep 05, 2011 at 11:00:13AM +0200, Harald Welte wrote:
> > So unless there is a really compelling reason to change, I would want to
> > have it stay like it is.
> There is surely no compelling reason to do changes like these.
> My idea was just to add some structure to the include directory +
> * it was cheap
> * I didn't expect much trouble from the change
> 
> I have more ideas like this, e.g.:
> * declaring _all_ defined functions (cproto [1] makes that easy and works
>   quite well)

I'm not sure if that really is good.  Some of our 'undeclared functions'
are more or less intentional and serve as a reminder that something
still has to be cleaned up, i.e. the interface is not as clean as it
should be.

> * sorting #include statements in groups were applicable (like in
>   opensolaris code)

Not sure if that makes that much sense either.

What I'd appreciate more is patches 

* towards completing the recently-introduced doxygen API reference.
  * first aim for covering all exportet functions of all libraries
    in a short way
  * secondly, expand the documentation by making it more verbose
  * finally, start documenting internal interfaces inside openbsc,
    osmo-bts, osmocomBB, etc.
* introducing EXPORT_SYMBOL() to hide library-internal symbols from
  applications

Regards,
	Harald
-- 
- Harald Welte <laforge at gnumonks.org>           http://laforge.gnumonks.org/
============================================================================
"Privacy in residential applications is a desirable marketing option."
                                                  (ETSI EN 300 175-7 Ch. A6)