Legal situation when using auth policy token

This is merely a historical archive of years 2008-2021, before the migration to mailman3.

A maintained and still updated list archive can be found at https://lists.osmocom.org/hyperkitty/list/OpenBSC@lists.osmocom.org/.

Harald Welte laforge at gnumonks.org
Tue Oct 18 07:46:48 UTC 2011


Hi Holger,

On Tue, Oct 18, 2011 at 09:27:00AM +0200, Holger Hans Peter Freyther wrote:

> IANAL, regarding the token auth, you might find a way instead of sending the
> MM Auth Reject to omit the LU Accept and schedule a LU Reject after the SMS is
> sent? Did the user accidently end in your network and thanks to a broken phone
> stayed in it, but didn't read the SMS that is on the lock-screen of his fruit
> phone? Did the "nice' guy open a ticket with the fruit company too?

We tried this early in the project: Many phones don't accept CP-DATA
before having received a LU Accept.

-- 
- Harald Welte <laforge at gnumonks.org>           http://laforge.gnumonks.org/
============================================================================
"Privacy in residential applications is a desirable marketing option."
                                                  (ETSI EN 300 175-7 Ch. A6)




More information about the OpenBSC mailing list