[OT] Re: Different protocols

This is merely a historical archive of years 2008-2021, before the migration to mailman3.

A maintained and still updated list archive can be found at https://lists.osmocom.org/hyperkitty/list/OpenBSC@lists.osmocom.org/.

Harald Welte laforge at gnumonks.org
Sun Jul 17 20:34:24 UTC 2011


On Mon, Jul 18, 2011 at 04:00:29AM +0900, Seungju Kim wrote:
> > What I'm personally surprised though is why nobody hires people (like us)
> > to develop translators / gateways between those dialects.  That's
> > probably a hell lot cheaper than replacing your core network from one
> > vendor with another vendor...
> 
> I think it is because of the user agreement, I do not think that
> mobile operators are allowed to trace the dialects. 

I don't think you could do this, at least not under German law.  Running
a program and observing its input and output are always permitted, as
long as you legally obtained the program.

How do you think that Samba would have ever become such a success, and
unharmed by Microsoft? Because they couldn't do anything against people
observing communications protocols.

> Have you heard of a game Starcraft? Its end user agreement says that
> users must not sniff packets nor make gateways that mimics their
> protocols. 

Not everything that people put in their EULAs is legally valid and
enforcable.

-- 
- Harald Welte <laforge at gnumonks.org>           http://laforge.gnumonks.org/
============================================================================
"Privacy in residential applications is a desirable marketing option."
                                                  (ETSI EN 300 175-7 Ch. A6)




More information about the OpenBSC mailing list